Francisco Comesana vs Nicolas Jarry Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Insights on upcoming tennis match:

1. Recent performance on second serve: In the past six months, Comesana has exhibited remarkable proficiency on their second serve by winning 49.44% of points. Similarly, Jarry has attained a success rate of 48.52%. This statistic bears a significant correlation to the accuracy of match predictions.
2. Recent return game statistics: Analyzing the return game stats, Comesana has outperformed their opponents on winning 49% of second serve points in recent matches. In contrast, Jarry's success rate stands at 42.67%. Moreover, Comesana has achieved a return rate of 30.46% on first serve points, while Jarry has managed 23.71%. These figures play a crucial role in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
3. Under pressure analysis: When it comes to handling pressure situations, Comesana has an impressive record of saving 60.75% of breakpoints in recent matches. On the other hand, Jarry has been successful in saving 65.38% of breakpoints. This valuable statistic aids in making predictions for in-game betting.
4. Performance overview: Examining their overall performance in the past year, Comesana has won 58.82% of their matches (40/28 win/loss), while Jarry has secured victory in 39.47% of matches (15/23 win/loss). These figures present a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head prediction.
5. Surface suitability: On clay, Comesana boasts an impressive career win percentage of 66% (249/130 win/loss), making it their most successful surface. Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts has been subpar with a win percentage of 0% (0/1 win/loss). As for Jarry, their career win percentage on clay is 65% (297/161 win/loss), while on indoor hard courts, it diminishes to 34% (11/21 win/loss).
6. Player level: Over the past year, Comesana has primarily participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments worth more than $10,000, achieving an exceptional win rate of 68.89% (31/14 win/loss). In contrast, Jarry has predominantly competed in the Masters series, winning 50% of their matches (9/9 win/loss). It is vital to consider the event level at which players have been performing when predicting the favorite.
7. Opponent quality statistics: During the last twelve months, Comesana has faced opponents with an average ranking of 207.75, whereas Jarry has confronted players with an average ranking of 79.84.
8. Deciding set performance: For those seeking live predictions and betting opportunities, should the match proceed to a deciding set, Comesana has prevailed in 72% of such situations within the past year. In contrast, Jarry has achieved a 50% success rate in all matches played on the tour.
9. Current event head-to-head stats: While historical player performance holds immense predictive value, it is also essential to examine current event statistics to evaluate the form of the players. Please refer to the section below (eventStats) for current event details if the players have already played a match in the ongoing event. Besides, it is worth considering that certain players may excel more in specific tournaments, influencing the ultimate outcome.
10. Break point conversion: Comesana has showcased an impressive ability to convert 41.41% of breakpoint opportunities, while Jarry has achieved a success rate of 28.38% in breaking their opponents' serve. This statistic serves as a significant factor in making live betting decisions when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
11. If you are interested in models capable of accurately predicting tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point. (Warning: Only suitable for avid statisticians)